ABSTRACT
While the standard regimen of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine includes two doses administered three weeks apart, some public health authorities decided to space them, raising concerns about vaccine efficacy. Here, we analyzed longitudinal humoral responses including antibody binding, Fc-mediated effector functions and neutralizing activity against the D614G strain but also variants of concern and SARS-CoV-1 in a cohort of SARS-CoV-2 naive and previously infected individuals, with an interval of sixteen weeks between the two doses. While the administration of a second dose to previously infected individuals did not significantly improve humoral responses, we observed a significant increase of humoral responses in naive individuals after the 16-weeks delayed second shot, achieving similar levels as in previously infected individuals. Our results highlight strong vaccine-elicited humoral responses with an extended interval BNT162b2 vaccination for naive individuals.
Subject(s)
Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeABSTRACT
IntroductionCOVID-19 vaccine efficacy has been evaluated in large clinical trials and in real-world situation. Although they have proven to be very effective in the general population, little is known about their efficacy in immunocompromised patients. HIV-infected individuals response to vaccine may vary according to the type of vaccine and their level of immunosuppression. We evaluated immunogenicity of an mRNA anti-SARS CoV-2 vaccine in HIV-positive individuals. MethodsHIV-positive individuals (n=121) were recruited from HIV clinics in Montreal and stratified according to their CD4 counts. A control group of 20 health care workers naive to SARS CoV-2 was used. The participants Anti-RBD IgG responses were measured by ELISA at baseline and 3 to 4 weeks after receiving the first dose of an mRNA vaccine). ResultsEleven of 121 participants had anti-COVID-19 antibodies at baseline, and a further 4 had incomplete data for the analysis. Mean anti-RBD IgG responses were similar between between the HIV negative control group (n=20) and the combined HIV+ group (n=106) (p = 0.72). However, these responses were significantly lower in the group with <250 CD4 cells/mm3. (p<0.0001). Increasing age was independently associated with decreased immunogenicity. ConclusionHIV-positive individuals with CD4 counts over 250 cells/mm3 have an anti-RBD IgG response similar to the general population. However, HIV-positive individuals with the lowest CD4 counts (<250 cells/mm3) have a weaker response. These data would support the hypothesis that a booster dose might be needed in this subgroup of HIV-positive individuals, depending on their response to the second dose.